![regrading rudy gay trade regrading rudy gay trade](https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/538e2537d3a8c8c75cc77d7935039ab60a96abe9/c=0-208-3996-2462/local/-/media/USATODAY/test/2014/01/11/1389484457000-USP-NBA-Charlotte-Bobcats-at-Sacramento-Kings.jpg)
Refer to the reply I left on Silk Tork's talk page. Collect ( talk) 11:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC) I should think rather that as it has been said that the paragraph was not perfect and would be subject to improvement, what has brought this to the fore was a premature deletion of the sentence in question. I would also suggest the rather editoriail addition from Viriditas on the IRS actions should also require extended discussion here - ot os a major change and appears on its fact to be argumentative (I do not follow the sub-article, but suspect my cavil holds there as well). I rather thought ST had considered this mainly completed at this point. This seems rather late in the process to make such major changes here. That gets into contentious territory relating to the extent to which the entire movement can be characterized along such lines verses factions that espouse different orientations, and the perceptions thereof, etc.- Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 02:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC) The details and specifics as to "and who has described it as such?" can be addressed in the subarticle. In what sense is it libertarian (and who has described it as such)?.In what sense is it conservative (and who has described it as such)?.In what sense is it populist (and who has described it as such)?.The same questions would remain, and could be explicated along the lines: The meaning of the statement that it has been described as encompassing elements of the three would remain largely unchanged even with your statement. I'd basically agree with your statement in the context of a copy edit for the opening sentence, but think the section should probably be slightly expanded-though I don't want to spend a lot of time on it.
![regrading rudy gay trade regrading rudy gay trade](https://sportsnaut.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/rudy-gay-spurs-1536x1024.jpg)
This is a prickly issue that straddles several points mentioned in different places in the article, including "grass-roots", Koch brothers, commentaries on origin, etc.- Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 01:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC) It is more correct to say, "It is a populist movement that is partly social conservative and partly libertarian." Do any reliable sources question that? TFD ( talk) 02:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Good question. This is present in the discourse surrounding the Constitution, for example.Įven further, the perception that the TPm is astroturfed probably deserves mention a another minority viewpoint in this section. The TPm has motivated some scholars to examine areas where there is overlapping commonality between conservativism, libertarianism and populism in the TPm, and how that relates to those categories in general. Furthermore, the fact that there are generally considered to be some inherent contradictions among each paring of the three aforementioned characterizations is one factor that has motivated study of the movement. The general public probably recognizes that there are some unsavory elements to the movement as a whole while viewing the movement per se as something more than what is represented by the individual incidents. In fact, these three characterizations are more than likely more fundamental to the perceptions of the TPm than racism. The point, as Silk Tork has indicated, being that ".the article now does not contain key information regarding perceptions of the Tea Party". Should be explicated briefly one sentence apiece for a new paragraph to replace the verbatim repetition of the sentence in the lead. The movement has been called partly conservative, partly libertarian, and partly populist. While a copy editing solution has been put forth as an option, maybe each of the three characterizations in the opening sentence 7 'Viable' versions of the 'Agenda' sectionĪdd a paragraph at the beginning of the Perceptions of the Tea Party summary section?.4.5 The Tea Party movement and the Constitution.4.4 Working draft 2 of only "The Constitution" subsection.4.3 Working draft of Agenda section (partial) with section on the Constitution.4 The Agenda section and subsection entitled "The Constitution".2 The Constitution, Agenda section, opening sentence of lead, etc.1 Add a paragraph at the beginning of the Perceptions of the Tea Party summary section?.